In the modern music industry, the phrase "owning your masters" has become a rallying cry for artists seeking control over their work and legacy. A growing number of musicians—from established legends to rising independent stars—are actively trying to regain ownership of their master recordings, a critical move that directly affects their income, artistic rights, and generational wealth.
A "master" is the original recording from which all copies of a song or album are made. Whoever owns the master controls how that recording is used—whether it’s licensed for commercials, streamed on platforms, or sampled in new works. Traditionally, record labels have held ownership of masters in exchange for fronting the costs of production, marketing, and distribution.
For decades, the standard recording contract gave record labels the rights to an artist's master recordings. In return, artists were paid advances and received a portion of revenue (royalties). While this arrangement helped launch careers, it often left artists with minimal long-term income, especially once their popularity declined.
Some artists have described this model as predatory, as they generate massive profits for labels without retaining rights to the music they created.
In recent years, the push for master ownership has intensified. Artists across genres are increasingly aware of the long-term value of their catalogs—not just financially, but culturally and historically. This movement is driven by several factors:
1. Digital Streaming Economics
Streaming services pay fractions of a cent per play.
Labels collect the bulk of these royalties.
Artists who don’t own their masters see very little of this income.
2. Licensing and Sync Deals
Masters can be licensed for use in films, TV, ads, and video games.
These deals can be extremely lucrative—but only the master owner benefits directly.
3. Public Awareness and Advocacy
Prominent artists like Taylor Swift, Prince, Kanye West, and JoJo have publicly fought for or spoken about master ownership.
Their efforts have inspired a new generation of musicians to demand better deals or work independently.
Taylor Swift: After a high-profile dispute over her early masters, she began re-recording her albums to own the new masters, effectively bypassing the old ones owned by her former label.
Prince: Famously changed his name to a symbol in protest of label control, eventually gaining ownership of his master recordings later in his career.
Anita Baker: Regained her masters after a prolonged campaign and public support.
Russ and other independent rappers: Built fanbases and monetized music without signing major deals, retaining 100% ownership of their work.
Snoop Dogg: Acquired the legendary label Death Row Records in 2022 and stated his intention to gain control over its classic catalog.
Re-recording Old Material: Like Taylor Swift, artists can create new versions of their songs to bypass previous master agreements.
Negotiating Buybacks: Some negotiate directly with labels to buy back master rights, often at a high cost.
Legal Challenges: Artists may contest contracts signed under pressure or without proper representation.
Independent Production: Emerging artists now often bypass labels entirely, using digital tools to record, distribute, and promote their work—while retaining full ownership from the start.
High Buyout Costs: Labels may demand millions to relinquish ownership.
Contractual Limitations: Clauses may prevent artists from re-recording for years.
Corporate Mergers: Masters may be buried in complex rights held by multiple entities.
The movement is not limited to the U.S. Artists around the world—in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Europe—are pushing for more equitable contracts. In developing markets, where exploitation is even more common, the movement for artist empowerment and master ownership is slowly taking root.
Empowered Artists: Technology, social media, and awareness are enabling artists to take more control than ever before.
New Business Models: Some record labels now offer more artist-friendly deals that allow for shared or time-limited master ownership.
Cultural Legacy: As artists gain control, they can ensure their work is preserved, respected, and passed down as intended.
The growing push by artists to reclaim their masters is not just a legal or financial issue—it’s about dignity, autonomy, and legacy. It reflects a broader shift in the music industry toward artist empowerment, transparency, and fairness. As more musicians shine a light on the importance of owning their work, the industry is being forced to evolve—and listeners, too, are starting to understand the stakes behind the music they love.
Sources: Billboard, Rolling Stone, Variety, Music Business Worldwide, artist interviews and public statements.