Donald Trump has ignited international controversy after proposing that the United States take control of the Gaza Strip and transform the war-torn enclave into a U.S.-administered zone.

The proposal, which he has described in various remarks as a potential “freedom zone” or redevelopment project, would involve the U.S. overseeing Gaza’s reconstruction following the devastation of the Israel–Hamas war. Trump has argued that the territory is largely uninhabitable and would require outside control to rebuild and stabilize.

According to reporting from multiple international outlets, Trump’s vision includes the idea of removing or relocating Gaza’s Palestinian population while the territory is rebuilt under U.S. administration. Critics say such a move would amount to forced displacement of more than two million people and violate international law.

The proposal has drawn strong opposition from Arab governments and many U.S. allies. Regional leaders have instead pushed alternative plans that would keep Palestinians in Gaza while placing the territory under a transitional Palestinian-led administration with international support.

Diplomats and policy analysts have warned that a U.S. takeover could inflame tensions across the Middle East, undermine long-standing diplomatic frameworks, and provoke further instability. Many governments have reiterated their support for a two-state solution, in which Gaza forms part of a future Palestinian state rather than a foreign-administered territory.

Within the United States, the proposal has also stirred debate. Some supporters frame it as a bold reconstruction effort aimed at eliminating militant groups and rebuilding infrastructure. Opponents, including lawmakers and international law experts, say it risks entangling the U.S. in a prolonged occupation and humanitarian crisis.

The idea comes as the region continues to grapple with the aftermath of months of conflict that left large parts of Gaza destroyed and its population facing severe shortages of food, water, and medical care.

While the proposal has not advanced into a formal policy, its political impact has already been felt, triggering condemnation abroad and intensifying debate at home over the future of Gaza and the broader Middle East peace process.

Sources: Reuters, Al Jazwwra, AP News