However, lawmakers from both parties have challenged that interpretation, saying the War Powers Resolution of 1973 does not allow a unilateral pause of the statutory timeline. Several members of Congress are now pushing for formal votes either to authorize the conflict or force its end.

The debate intensified after an analysis published by Al Jazeera questioned whether the ceasefire truly resets legal obligations under U.S. law, or whether continued strikes still constitute active hostilities. Legal scholars cited in the report warned that redefining “termination” could set a precedent for expanded executive war authority.

The Washington Post reported growing concern among lawmakers that the administration is stretching executive power, with some comparing the situation to past post-9/11 military authorizations that gradually expanded over time without renewed congressional approval.

Meanwhile, an AP live update feed tracking the Trump administration noted that officials continue to defend their position, arguing that operational phases of the conflict have shifted and no longer meet the threshold of “active hostilities” under the War Powers framework.

The dispute comes as U.S.-Iran tensions remain high despite the ceasefire, with sporadic regional strikes and heightened military alert levels across the Middle East. Analysts warn that uncertainty over legal authority could complicate diplomatic efforts and prolong instability in the region.

Congress is expected to hold hearings and potentially introduce resolutions in the coming days as pressure builds for a definitive legal and political resolution.

Sources: Reuters, AlJazeers, AP News, The Washington Post