Embedded Files
Advertise with Aurax News — Reach a Global Audience Today.
Appeals Court Blocks Trump White House Ballroom Project
By Aurax Desk | August 8, 2026 | 2 min read
A federal appeals court has ordered the Trump administration to halt construction of a planned $400 million White House ballroom, ruling that the project cannot proceed without congressional approval. The decision places a major presidential construction initiative on hold while the administration prepares to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The White House complex in Washington, where the Trump administration's planned $400 million ballroom is the subject of a federal court dispute.
A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled Friday that President Donald Trump does not have unilateral authority to substantially alter the White House complex. The proposed ballroom, about 90,000 square feet, is being built on the site of the East Wing, which Trump ordered demolished in 2025. The court upheld an earlier injunction obtained by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which challenged the project over the administration's decision to begin construction without congressional authorization.
The ruling does not permanently prohibit construction but requires the administration to stop above-ground work while the legal challenge proceeds and until Congress authorizes the project. The court's order is stayed for 14 days to allow the administration to seek Supreme Court review. Trump has argued that the ballroom is necessary for large official functions and has also cited security concerns, while the administration maintains that the project is privately funded and does not require congressional approval. The ballroom's projected cost has risen to about $400 million from earlier estimates, adding financial and constitutional questions to the dispute over the White House's authority to alter a historic federal property.
Sources: The Associated Press, Reuters and CBS News, with information from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse