Advertise with Aurax News — Reach a Global Audience Today.
By Aurax Radio | July 17, 2026 | 2 min read
Trinidad and Tobago's Court of Appeal has ordered the conditional release of businessman Dominic Hadeed and his wife, Genevieve Hadeed, from prison to house arrest while their legal challenge to their detention continues. The ruling comes amid an ongoing State of Emergency that has prompted legal scrutiny over the use of preventive detention powers.
The Court of Appeal on Friday ordered the release of businessman Dominic Hadeed and his wife, Genevieve Hadeed, from prison, directing that they instead be placed under strict house arrest while they pursue a legal challenge to their detention under Trinidad and Tobago's State of Emergency regulations. The judges ruled that the couple should be freed from custody subject to a series of conditions, including electronic monitoring, restrictions on their movement and communication, and continued police supervision. The decision overturned an earlier High Court ruling that had denied their request for interim relief, although their broader constitutional and judicial review proceedings remain before the courts.
Dominic and Genevieve Hadeed were detained in late June under Preventive Detention Orders issued after authorities alleged they posed a threat to public safety during the nationwide State of Emergency. The government has maintained that the emergency measures are necessary to combat serious organized crime and gang violence, while the Hadeeds have argued through their attorneys that their continued detention without criminal charges violates their constitutional rights. Their legal team sought either immediate release or supervised house arrest pending the outcome of the case, contending that less restrictive measures could adequately address any public safety concerns.
As part of the Court of Appeal's order, the couple must remain at their residence except when authorized by the court, wear electronic monitoring devices, surrender their travel documents, and comply with additional reporting and communication restrictions. The ruling does not determine the merits of the allegations or the legality of the Preventive Detention Orders, issues that will be decided in subsequent proceedings. The case has drawn significant public attention because it tests the scope of executive detention powers during a State of Emergency and could influence how similar preventive detention cases are handled in Trinidad and Tobago's courts.