Advertise with Aurax News — Reach a Global Audience Today.
By Aurax Radio | July 9, 2026 | 2 min read
A High Court judge has refused an application by businessman Dominic Hadeed and his wife, Genevieve Hadeed, to fast-track their constitutional challenge over their continued detention under Trinidad and Tobago's State of Emergency regulations. The ruling means the case will proceed through the normal judicial process while related legal proceedings over their detention continue.
Eastern Correctional and Rehabilitation Centre (ECRC) where Dominic Hadeed is being held.
Businessman Dominic Hadeed and his wife, Genevieve Hadeed, have been denied permission to expedite their constitutional lawsuit challenging their detention under Preventive Detention Orders issued during Trinidad and Tobago's ongoing State of Emergency. The decision was delivered by High Court Judge Frank Seepersad, who ruled that the matter did not warrant accelerated treatment ahead of other cases before the court. The couple remains in custody while pursuing separate legal challenges to the lawfulness of their detention.
The Hadeeds were detained in late June following allegations that they were involved in a conspiracy to assassinate senior government officials. Authorities subsequently issued Preventive Detention Orders under emergency regulations introduced after the government declared a State of Emergency to address serious organized crime and national security concerns. The couple denies the allegations and argues that their detention is unlawful, while the State maintains that the measures are justified under the emergency powers framework. The High Court has previously declined applications seeking their immediate release, allowing the broader legal challenges to continue through the courts.
During the latest hearing, attorneys for the Hadeeds argued that an expedited timetable was necessary because of the potential impact prolonged detention could have on their rights and well-being. The court, however, determined that there was insufficient basis to grant priority treatment over other pending constitutional matters. The ruling leaves the constitutional claim to proceed under the court's ordinary schedule while separate appeals and judicial review proceedings concerning the Preventive Detention Orders remain before the judiciary. The case has drawn national attention as it tests the scope of emergency powers and the balance between national security measures and constitutional protections during a State of Emergency.
Sources:Information reported by the Trinidad Guardian, Trinidad Express, Reuters and official High Court court documents.