Advertise with Aurax News — Reach a Global Audience Today.
By Aurax Radio | September 14, 2026 | 2 min read
The Trinidad and Tobago government has abandoned its appeal against a court decision placing businesswoman Star Sabga under house arrest. The move follows the revocation of her Preventive Detention Order and leaves a broader constitutional challenge over her detention pending.
The Hall of Justice in Port of Spain, where legal proceedings involving Star Sabga’s detention and the State’s appeal have been heard.
PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad and Tobago — The Trinidad and Tobago Police Service and the Office of the Attorney General have agreed to withdraw their appeal against a High Court ruling that placed 69-year-old businesswoman Star Sabga under house arrest, according to court proceedings reported Monday. The decision ends the State’s challenge to the conditions under which Sabga was released after spending several weeks in detention under a Preventive Detention Order.
The appeal followed a July ruling by High Court Judge Vigel Paul, who ordered Sabga to be placed under house arrest conditions previously imposed on her niece, Genevieve Hadeed, and Hadeed’s husband, Dominic Hadeed. The State subsequently challenged that decision before the Court of Appeal. On Sept. 10, Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander revoked Sabga’s PDO, ending her detention at her Westmoorings apartment. Appellate Judge Carla Brown-Antoine later gave the State time to decide whether to continue the appeal, noting that Sabga’s release had raised questions about whether the case remained relevant.
Sabga, the Hadeeds and other relatives were detained under PDOs in late June during Trinidad and Tobago’s state of emergency. The detentions were based on intelligence reportedly gathered by the Strategic Services Agency, and the relatives were accused of conspiring to assassinate senior government officials. The Hadeeds’ initial request for interim release was rejected by High Court Judge Frank Seepersad, but a Court of Appeal panel later upheld their bid, questioning the justification advanced for their continued detention. Another panel, led by Chief Justice Ronnie Boodoosingh, stayed that ruling pending the State’s final appeal to the United Kingdom-based Privy Council.
The Hadeeds’ PDOs were eventually revoked after the Privy Council indicated it would not hear the State’s appeal until October. The stay had been granted largely on the expectation that the appeal would be heard within two weeks. The State of Emergency Review Tribunal subsequently recommended the release of Sabga and the Hadeeds. The withdrawal of the appeal leaves the legal costs associated with Sabga’s house arrest challenge to be determined by the Court of Appeal.
The family is continuing with a substantive constitutional claim challenging their detention. They allege that the government targeted them because of their ethnicity and because of separate legal proceedings involving the Hadeeds’ leases for state-owned land in Tacarigua. They also contend that statements allegedly made by Sabga during an intercepted conversation with Genevieve Hadeed were incorrectly attributed to Dominic Hadeed in his detention order. The constitutional case is scheduled for hearing on Oct. 19.