Advertise with Aurax News — Reach a Global Audience Today.
By Aurax Radio | August 30, 2026 | 2 min read
The Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission has taken legal action against attorney and politician Keith Scotland over the handling of a claim to recover about $2.4 million in unpaid electricity charges. The dispute centers on litigation against Flavorite Foods Ltd. and allegations that procedural failures caused T&TEC to lose the opportunity to recover the debt directly.
Keith Scotland, an attorney and politician, is facing legal action from T&TEC over the handling of a $2.4 million debt-recovery claim.
T&TEC’s legal action follows earlier pre-action proceedings in which the state-owned electricity provider alleged that Scotland and another attorney failed to properly pursue claims filed against Flavorite Foods. The commission said the debt, totaling about $2.4 million, remained unpaid after multiple court proceedings were struck out. T&TEC has maintained that its former legal representatives failed to take necessary steps to advance the cases and that the limitation period for recovering the debt from Flavorite Foods expired in January 2026.
The dispute involves three claims filed in T&TEC’s name against Flavorite Foods, with the commission alleging that two were struck out after they were not properly advanced following the company’s failure to enter a defense. T&TEC has also alleged that a subsequent claim was filed without its authorization and was ultimately struck out. The commission is seeking to hold the attorneys financially responsible for the loss and has indicated that it may pursue aggravated and exemplary damages. The allegations remain disputed and will have to be determined through the court process.
The case highlights the potential financial consequences for public bodies when debt-recovery litigation is not completed within statutory time limits. T&TEC had previously signaled that it was considering legal action against Scotland and his law firm over the matter, making the latest proceedings the next stage in a dispute that has drawn political and public attention. The underlying electricity debt, the conduct of the litigation and the responsibility for the failed recovery effort will now be examined through the courts.