A U.S. Court of Appeals ruling on December 1, 2025, has disqualified Alina Habba from serving as the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, marking a significant legal decision regarding her appointment. The court determined that her elevation violated federal law, specifically the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA), which governs temporary appointments. Habba was initially appointed by former President Donald Trump as acting U.S. Attorney, but after her Senate nomination was withdrawn, she was reassigned as first assistant. She was then elevated to acting U.S. Attorney, which the court ruled bypassed legal procedures.

The court’s decision has rendered Habba’s time in office unlawful, calling into question the legitimacy of actions and prosecutions under her leadership. Legal experts note that this ruling could have wider implications, as it could potentially affect other similar interim appointments, challenging their legality.

This ruling has drawn attention from political and legal circles, raising concerns about bypassing established legal procedures for federal appointments. Critics argue that such violations undermine the integrity of the judicial system and emphasize the need for stronger oversight of executive branch appointments. The decision could have consequences for future appointments made by the Trump administration and subsequent administrations, highlighting the importance of following legal protocols in appointing U.S. Attorneys.

As the case develops, its implications for the Justice Department and future temporary appointments will continue to be closely watched. This ruling concludes Habba's brief and controversial tenure as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, prompting broader questions about procedures governing federal prosecutors.

Sources: NBC News, Reuters, The Guardian, Washington Post