WASHINGTON, D.C. — A series of U.S. military operations targeting suspected drug-smuggling vessels near Venezuelan waters has triggered intense scrutiny over the legality and oversight of the strikes, particularly one incident in early September that reportedly involved the killing of survivors.

The operations, part of a broader anti-narcotics strategy in the Caribbean, were authorized under the leadership of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and supported by President Donald Trump. According to multiple reports, the September 2 strike targeted a vessel believed to be transporting narcotics. While initial engagement disabled the boat, two individuals reportedly survived the first attack. Allegations have since emerged that a second strike was ordered to eliminate those survivors, raising concerns about potential violations of international law.

Hegseth has denied issuing any directive to target survivors, calling the claims politically motivated and inaccurate. The Pentagon has maintained that all actions were conducted within legal parameters and focused on individuals classified as narco-terrorists. President Trump has publicly backed Hegseth, emphasizing the administration’s commitment to aggressive counter-narcotics enforcement.

The incident has prompted calls for congressional oversight. Lawmakers from both parties have requested briefings and documentation related to the strikes, including communications and operational protocols. Legal experts have also weighed in, warning that targeting incapacitated individuals or those attempting to surrender could breach the laws of armed conflict.

The strikes have drawn condemnation from Venezuela’s government, which accused the U.S. of violating international norms and escalating regional tensions. Human rights organizations and international observers have called for transparency and accountability, urging a formal investigation into the September 2 operation and others conducted in the region.

As of December 1, no arrests or disciplinary actions have been announced, and the Department of Defense has not released detailed findings from its internal review. The House and Senate Armed Services Committees are expected to hold hearings in the coming weeks.

The controversy adds to a growing debate over the scope of U.S. military authority in counter-narcotics operations and the balance between national security and adherence to international law. With tensions rising in the Caribbean and Latin America, the outcome of these investigations could shape future U.S. policy in the region.

Sources: Axios, The Hill, The Guardian, Politico, BBC News and the Washington Post